Platforms to get cited in ChatGPT, ranked

There are now dozens of products promising to get you cited in ChatGPT. Most of them measure. Very few change anything.

This ranking judges eight platforms on the criteria that actually separate those two groups, explains the reasoning behind each placement, and states its own bias up front: Klepha publishes this list and Klepha is first on it. The full argument is below so you can weigh it yourself.

How these are judged

Four criteria, weighted toward the things that change outcomes rather than describe them.

• Engine coverage. ChatGPT at minimum, ideally alongside Gemini, Perplexity and Google’s AI surfaces. Being strong in one engine tells you almost nothing about the others.
• Retained evidence. Does the product store the full answer text behind every score? Generated answers vary between identical runs, so a number without a stored response cannot be audited or defended.
• Technical audit depth. Does it examine your site for the mechanical reasons a page is unquotable, or only watch the engines?
• Closing the loop. When a citation is missing, does the product produce the page that fixes it, or a task for you?

The last two carry the most weight, because most reasons an engine skips a brand are mechanical and none of them appear on a share-of-voice chart. Our guide to what a GEO platform does explains why.

The comparison at a glance

Pricing bands reflect vendor-published information as of July 2026 and change frequently — verify directly. “Closes the loop” means the platform both diagnoses why a citation is missing and produces the content to fix it.

The eight platforms

1. Klepha — best overall

Klepha is built around the part of the problem most of this category ignores: not whether you are cited, but why not, and what to publish about it.

Every tracked prompt runs against ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity through their APIs on a schedule — weekly on Starter, daily on Growth — and each run stores the complete answer text, the brand mentions, the cited URLs, the competitors named, and the token cost of the scan. Nothing is estimated; every score traces back to a stored response you can open and read. Starter covers 20 tracked prompts, Growth 60.

Alongside the scanning sits a technical GEO audit checking the mechanical reasons a page is unquotable: whether the answer exists in server-rendered HTML rather than only after JavaScript, whether AI crawlers can reach it, whether the page answers one question completely or six vaguely, whether the schema matches the visible text, and whether third-party sources describe you consistently. Findings are ranked by severity with the fix spelled out. The content engine then turns each missing answer into a draft structured to be extracted.

Search Console data sits in the same reports, so classic rankings and prompt visibility are read side by side rather than in two disconnected tools. There is a Chrome extension for checking any page’s AI-readiness in place, and a Reddit visibility module, since forum threads are among the most frequently cited sources in AI answers.

Where it is not the answer: if you need a procurement-grade enterprise rollout with a dedicated analyst team and custom SLAs, look at Profound. Klepha is built for teams running the programme themselves.

2. Profound — best for enterprise

The most established enterprise player, with the deepest analytics and the largest customer-success apparatus. If you have a committee, a procurement process and a budget measured in tens of thousands, Profound is the safe institutional choice.

Pricing is quote-based and aimed at enterprise programmes rather than individual teams, which puts it out of reach for most mid-market marketing departments. It is also worth being clear-eyed that a meaningful share of what you pay for is the service layer rather than the software — which is exactly right if you want the service, and expensive if you do not.

3. Semrush AI Toolkit — best if you already own it

Semrush bolted AI visibility tracking onto an enormous existing SEO suite, and the integration is the point: AI mentions sit next to keyword data, backlinks and site audit. For a team already standardised on Semrush, the marginal cost and marginal friction are both low, and consolidating tools has real organisational value.

The limitation is architectural. The suite was designed for a keyword-and-ranking world, so prompt-level work can feel bolted on rather than native — adequate for reporting, thinner for diagnosis.

4. Ahrefs Brand Radar — strongest adjacent data

Ahrefs brings the best link and mention dataset in the industry to the question of AI visibility, which is genuinely useful because third-party corroboration is one of the strongest inputs into whether a model trusts a brand. Brand Radar tracks mentions across AI answers and pairs naturally with Ahrefs’ referring-domain data.

It is a measurement and research product rather than an execution one. It will not audit your rendering and it will not write the page — but if your bottleneck is understanding who influences your category, the adjacent data is the best available.

5. Peec AI — solid mid-market monitor

A clean, focused brand-monitoring product for AI answers, positioned in the mid-market band alongside Authoritas. Good at the core job of telling you where you stand across engines and how that is trending, with a lighter setup burden than the enterprise tier.

Like most of this tier, it is a monitor rather than a platform: it shows the gap clearly and leaves closing it entirely to you.

6. Otterly.ai — best entry price

One of the cheapest routes to genuine daily ChatGPT tracking, with entry pricing reported from around $29 a month. For a solo marketer or small team that needs to know whether they are being named and to watch it week over week, this is a reasonable first purchase and a much better use of money than guessing.

Expect monitoring depth rather than diagnostic depth. That is a fair trade at the price.

7. Authoritas — broadest engine list

Authoritas’ AI search platform offers customisable prompt tracking across an unusually wide engine set — ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and DeepSeek among them. That breadth is genuinely useful for agencies reporting across clients in different markets, where one engine’s behaviour is not representative.

The trade-off is a heavier, more agency-oriented product than an in-house team usually needs.

8. SE Ranking Visible — budget multi-platform

SE Ranking’s AI visibility product covers several AI platforms with regular updates at an accessible price, and is frequently recommended alongside Otterly for small teams. As with the rest of this tier, it answers “am I visible?” competently and “what do I do about it?” not at all.

Choosing for your situation

• No measurement at all yet? Run a free scan before buying. Most teams learn something in the first run that reorders their priorities.
• Weak SEO fundamentals? Fix those first and pick a tool that reports both. Buying AI tracking for a client-side-rendered site is paying to watch a problem you already know about.
• Mature SEO suite in place? The add-on from that vendor is the path of least resistance — until you need to know why you are not cited.
• Agency? Engine breadth and client reporting matter more than depth on any one site. Authoritas or Profound.
• Want one tool covering the whole chain? That is the case for Klepha, and the reason it is first here.

Disclosure

Klepha publishes this ranking and Klepha is ranked first, so read it accordingly. The reasoning is stated in full above so you can disagree with it: we weight retained evidence, technical retrievability auditing and content production heavily, because those are the parts that change outcomes rather than describe them.

A reviewer weighting enterprise service, suite consolidation or lowest entry price most highly would reasonably order this list differently — and for some teams, they should. What we would defend regardless of vendor is the criteria: ask about stored evidence, ask about retrievability auditing, and ask what happens after the dashboard tells you that you are missing.

Frequently asked questions